OUR IN-HOUSE APPLICATIONS

High-Speed Engine Block Conveyor

A high-speed conveyor system engineered for heavy engine block transfer with precise motion control.

Components Used:

Conveyor structure – F.EE GmbH

High load linear motion – IMI Bahr Modultechnik GmbH

Absorber, 2 Jaw Parallel Gripper, 3 Jaw Concentric Gripper – Zimmer GmbH

Challenge

100kg

WEIGHING
Engine blocks

3m/5s

SPEED
0.6 m/s

Long-term

DURABILITY
Precision & endurance

Solution

Improved precision with German-standard actuators and minimized mechanical parts using octanal profiles.

Results Achieved

High-speed transfer with consistent precision

Improved reliability and maintenance efficiency

Reduced mechanical parts and assembly time

Modular Slim Transfer Conveyor

A lightweight and modular transfer conveyor designed for fast operation and future scalability.

Components Used:

Overhead structure and adaptable mounting – F.EE GmbH

Challenge

Slim Simple

CONCEPT

24 m/min

HIGH SPEED

50kg

WEIGHING
Support Roof Part

Solution

Optimized layout and lightweight octagonal profiles improved the transfer function, enabling higher operating speeds and modular length extensions.

Results Achieved

Lightweight and clean mechanical design

Future-ready modular expansion capability

Fast cycle time

Flexible Overhead Transfer

An overhead transfer solution designed for lean production and multi-model handling within a single system.

Components Used:

Overhead structure and adaptable mounting – F.EE GmbH

Challenge

4.5m/2.25s

SPEED
2 m/s

10kg

WEIGHING
Support Roof Part

Solution

We re-engineered the machine structure using modular aluminum profiles to replace conventional heavy steel frames. By integrating precision German-standard actuators, the system achieved smooth and reliable motion with significantly lower overall mass.

Results Achieved

One system supporting multiple product models

Faster changeover and higher production flexibility

Reduced mechanical complexity and weight

Auto Measuring Machine

An upgraded inspection machine designed to improve efficiency while significantly reducing system weight.

Components Used:

Structural frame – F.EE GmbH

Linear motion and positioning – IMI Bahr Modultechnik

Challenge

2m/1s

SPEED

10 μm

REPEATABILITY

Solution

Octagonal aluminum profiles enable flexible, tool-less reconfiguration, reducing custom parts and facilitating quick adaptation to various workpieces.

Results Achieved

Significantly reduced machine weight

Easier installation and maintenance

Improved flexibility for future modifications

Simulation References

WHY SIMULATION MATTERS ?

Validate
Performance

Ensure the system works as expected before manufacturing

Reduce
Engineering Risk

Identify potential issues early in the design phase

Optimize
Motion & Cycle Time

Improve productivity and efficiency

Improve
Structural Design

Analyze loads and stress on critical components

Simulation Case Study
Full Loop Automation

Simulation was used to analyze and improve the system performance of a robotic production loop

Cycle Time Improvement
Initial Cycle Time
49 SEC
Cycle Time Reduced
20%
Final Cycle Time
39 SEC

Initial Concept

Two robots were introduced to replace manual operations.

Cycle Time

49 SEC

Final Concept

Robot sequencing was optimized to
reduce idle time, while three transfer units
were added to improve material flow

Cycle Time

39 SEC

4 Face Grinding Robot
Simulation was used to optimize material flow before implementation
Cycle Time Improvement
Initial Cycle Time
32 SEC
Cycle Time Reduced
10%
Final Cycle Time
29 SEC

Initial Concept

Initial layout with 1 buffer unit
Cycle Time

32 SEC

Final Concept

Optimized by increasing buffers from 1 to 3 units to stabilize material flow
Cycle Time

29 SEC

Our Simulation Capabilities
Static Simulation

Finite element analysis validated structural integrity under maximum load conditions before implementation.

Initial Design

FEA factor of safety plot of the initial robot stand design, minimum FOS 0.32
Factor of Safety

Input: Max Force (2 Robots)

FOS Minimum

0.32

Improved Design

FEA factor of safety plot of the improved robot stand design, minimum FOS 3.3
Factor of Safety

Input: Max Force (2 Robots)

FOS Minimum

3.3

CAD model of the robot stand structure with two mounted robot arms
Finite element displacement analysis of a robot stand frame under load
Finite element displacement analysis of a support column
Finite element displacement analysis of the robot stand, maximum displacement 0.5 mm
Finite element displacement analysis of an inclined transfer frame
Finite element displacement analysis of a machine base frame
Dynamic Simulation

Motion analysis simulations used to verify performance, optimize cycle time, and validate complex motion sequences before manufacturing.